|
1. Open source solution,以Openswan/freeswan與OpenVPN為主。其產品所需的軟體功能有哪一些?1 B$ _- Y a' q$ R+ h- }* T
Freeswan: stop develop (stable IPSec)5 f7 B( D6 l' U) I& a Q3 Q
Openswan: still develop (stable IPSec). k+ c. F3 ^% ]5 s% I6 U& ~
OpenVPN: open source SSL (user layser SSL)4 v0 L4 k& A+ g; E, Y, g. ^* ?
2. Chip vendor solution 例如:Cavium有SDK solution,不用付費但其功能有哪些?
) E- T( l1 _/ A- M而SafeNet的SDK solution則需要付費,有哪些人有用過的經驗?其軟體的整合規格為何?! \& Y1 m8 B/ _% ~9 i
Using SOC is better. Such as Intel IXP4xx, Broadcom, Realtek SoC., U8 V# W7 `" A9 C$ a
Safenet and Cavium SDK is too expensive for SOHO product
. E2 Y/ c! t9 h, r7 N4 K9 Q3. propritary的software VPN stack。每家ODM的功能有所不同,其所需要的軟體支援與相關整合介面如何?
% ]" ?8 v; G0 `8 x8 `It is hard to integrate different software vendor's VPN stack due to lack of standard API |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|