|
在EDA Board 抓的資訊, 參考一下:9 F' c0 ?1 {2 y+ _0 {& f
- m8 l* v d& I1 I: B* b7 C8 w( gI believe that what you are getting at is that there is a specific structure of P+/Nwell/Psub that is used for
! G. t: z% e8 z w, c# V& X S: I
, B: q- j0 m; f( {6 ^- zthe "bipolar", so you are asking why use that structure rather than simply a P+/Nwell "diode". Here is my take * F/ E. N# _( q# ~. o4 }
" w$ N$ x d9 F9 N0 O9 r
on this:
" Y8 X7 Z5 E6 W/ A. c
" X- x* E3 I7 F+ L" a1- The "bipolar" will simulate more accurately than the "diode", since it will include the substrate current / `$ i' ?& x. U( t) S# V
/ x* x) n! ?- athat is probably not modeled for the "diode"., a" G6 b6 t1 {: W4 S" t
9 w3 _$ w5 W7 y
2- There usually is a specific structure for the "bipolar" that has characterization data available. When . m: P5 Z$ m4 ~% |5 N4 y
2 @! m6 A2 v: X- A
building a bandgap structure, the good characterization is needed in order to properly determine the tempco of
' I+ T: q) s, R! Z2 v4 b
1 V+ w) o, X2 L' U! j7 n y% `the Base-emitter voltage.5 L" ~0 l t( g; S5 y
- V& F7 i7 M8 G; i* j
3- The additional structure of the bipolar should help prevent current injection into other substrate tied . u8 H/ Y$ B$ ?: x S& ~
' `: s# q2 B U# @
devices.; c: J- V: l6 o: Q3 o+ u
O5 f( B, R9 J. }8 m
& c- v" g' g; t- r) P! u; R( P/ B4 j' q; j: F$ r8 O
There is, of course, nothing preventing the use of a P+/Nwell diode in your application. |
|