|
在EDA Board 抓的資訊, 參考一下:# r3 m' q* P( F( B1 [3 Q
4 \0 m3 V; N: j% c; r
I believe that what you are getting at is that there is a specific structure of P+/Nwell/Psub that is used for : @/ {5 W' ]& e' L3 R# V, m4 K
" R+ q* Q+ @! Vthe "bipolar", so you are asking why use that structure rather than simply a P+/Nwell "diode". Here is my take
% s$ @* ]) L) e7 |% R) ]6 b4 | w+ ?( O2 w3 [! l& n. n: L6 c
on this:" K/ v! r2 Y7 X3 \) A
7 [/ C- b* h# h x" U$ B
1- The "bipolar" will simulate more accurately than the "diode", since it will include the substrate current / ?; _! A6 \: p# P
% Y+ n3 N4 J3 Z+ ]" \& cthat is probably not modeled for the "diode".
' ], l) |" f7 l* B1 K1 o6 H$ G; g* M# b" S3 W) j% ^6 z" }
2- There usually is a specific structure for the "bipolar" that has characterization data available. When
" U( R) I4 M( {# S7 s4 E/ ]5 d5 B* |$ @+ M, ^( ?3 _! _
building a bandgap structure, the good characterization is needed in order to properly determine the tempco of , D1 ^2 [9 m% b8 w
1 y: ^# q5 s5 O: O8 R+ sthe Base-emitter voltage.
4 Q- b- d) o0 F9 D0 o& X9 t& M; t* w+ |4 t0 ] `6 J
3- The additional structure of the bipolar should help prevent current injection into other substrate tied % G4 A& M2 E' L& S1 O h
1 L2 J- ] H$ z" [0 \- }
devices.0 c: b6 B# p2 r( t5 ~: l; E8 x" V
1 [3 K J! j! p W. k" B" K : w. F2 A2 e4 N: s
4 T X8 n9 X+ GThere is, of course, nothing preventing the use of a P+/Nwell diode in your application. |
|